Search

The Prying Mantis

No Justice, No Peace – reflections on organic farming, CSA and domestic fair trade.

Month

December 2017

Getting a Fair Deal for Farmers, Farm workers and other Food chain workers: Standards to bring the Principle of Fairness to Life throughout the Organic Supply Chain  

 

By Elizabeth Henderson

Key words: Fairness, social justice, freedom of association

Summary

Fairness is one of the four foundational principles of organic agriculture, yet few certification programs have implanted the concepts of fairness in their standards. The Agricultural Justice Project (AJP) has created social standards, translating the abstract notions of social justice and fair trade into the concrete terms of pricing for farm products and working conditions on farms and food businesses. For organic agriculture to lead in creating a truly sustainable world food system, organic practice must embody the Principle of Fairness through fair trade, fair pricing and contracts, and socially just conditions on organic farms and food businesses.

Background

The early versions of the principles of the International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements (IFOAM), whose standards formed the basis for most of the organic standards around the world, included these comprehensive statements on social justice:

  1. To allow everyone involved in organic and sustainable production and processing a quality of life that meets their basic needs and allows an adequate return and satisfaction from their work, including a safe working environment.
  2. To progress toward an entire production, processing, and distribution chain that is both socially just and ecologically responsible. (From IFOAM Basic Standards list of Principle Aims.)

The most recent version of IFOAM’s Principle of Fairness is even more explicit:

“Organic agriculture should build on relationships that ensure fairness with regard to the common environment and life opportunities. Fairness is characterized by equity, respect, justice and stewardship of the shared world, both among people and in their relations to other living beings.

“This principle emphasizes that those involved in organic agriculture should conduct human relationships in a manner that ensures fairness at all levels and to all parties – farmers, workers, processors, distributors, traders and consumers. Organic agriculture should provide everyone involved with a good quality of life, and contribute to food sovereignty and reduction of poverty. It aims to produce a sufficient supply of good quality food and other products. This principle insists that animals should be provided with the conditions and opportunities of life that accord with their physiology, natural behavior and well-being.

“Natural and environmental resources that are used for production and consumption should be managed in a way that is socially and ecologically just and should be held in trust for future generations. Fairness requires systems of production, distribution and trade that are open and equitable and account for real environmental and social costs.” (IFOAM Principles 2005)

In the United States, organic agriculture developed in the 1970’s as movement with a wholistic approach to land and livelihood.  The farmers who were attracted to organic practices and their loyal customers agreed that decent prices, fair treatment of workers and animals, and care for mother earth all went together.  In the 1980’s, the Northeast Organic Farming Association endorsed these principles that can be found in our Program Manual to this day:

􀂃 To encourage non-exploitive treatment of farm workers.

􀂃 To create conditions for livestock that ensures them a life free of undue stress, pain

and/or suffering.

􀂃 To maximize farmers’ monetary returns and satisfaction for their work.

􀂃 To maintain the land in healthy condition for future generations.

Organic food enthusiasts were willing to pay a small premium for organic products to sustain the farms economically. They understood that the prices had to cover the true costs of production and they trusted their farmers to charge fairly and treat their workers with respect.

That all started to change as larger entities became involved and organic began to enter the mainstream. The initial family-scale farms and small independent processors faced overwhelming competition from an “organic industry” and large-scale farms that converted to organic purely as a marketing decision. The “American Organic Standards” developed by the Organic Trade Association (OTA) did not touch pricing and labor issues and then the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990, which established the National Organic Program (NOP) under USDA, followed suit.  When commenters criticized the national organic regulations for leaving out the social component, the NOP responded, that is “not in our purview.”

As a consequence, in the US today, social relations in organic agriculture mimic those of the dominant industrial food system, and organic farmers, even farmers who sell direct in local markets, have a hard time making ends meet. While farmers may be building equity in their farm businesses, many farmers are in debt and the farm family that lives entirely on farm earnings is rare. Farmers who want to provide a middle-class income for their families, depend on the off-farm earnings and health insurance from a family member’s job. Few farmers pay living wages to the people who work on their farms.

In 2013, the NOFA Domestic Fair Trade committee surveyed organic farmers in the NE states. Six hundred farmers – mostly certified organic – filled out some part of the survey and 350 completed it. PhD candidate Becca Berkey has analyzed the surveys. ( Her report is available using this link:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1kiXT0o8Ts-I3Yi2MjN_B5yD4E0I4fCdn5qtQzAYS7Jo/edit?usp=sharing

In their comments, farmers said they aspire to pay fair wages – but cannot earn enough from sales to cover the living wages and package of benefits they would like to provide and that would help retain good workers, reduce training costs and make their farms more resilient. A typical comment from the survey: “Unable to provide well-paid year-round work.”  The survey shows that hired labor only makes up 20% of the workforce on organic farms. Most of the work is done by the farmers themselves and their families.  Despite lots of good intentions to live up to the Principle of Fairness, most of the farmers who hire workers pay just over minimum wage, and the only benefit they provide is workers compensation which is required by law.

Just like farmers in developing countries, the family-scale farmers in developed countries and the people who work on their farms need to return to the principle of fairness in organic agriculture.

Food Justice Certification

This failure of organic standards to embrace the principle of fairness inspired the creation of what evolved into the Agricultural Justice Project (AJP).   In 1999, Michael Sligh of Rural Advancement Foundation International (RAFI-USA), Richard Mandelbaum and Nelson Carrasquillo of the Farmworker Support Committee (CATA), Marty Mesh of Florida Organic Growers (FOG) and I, Elizabeth Henderson representing the Northeast Organic Farming Association (NOFA), decided  to go “beyond”  the OTA and NOP definitions of  organic as a marketing label to develop standards for the fair and just treatment of the people who work in organic and sustainable agriculture. The success of international fair trade with the steady climb in numbers of people willing to spend a little more money to support family farms in developing countries has provided an encouraging model.  As a small-scale organic farmer, I feel strongly that it is not enough to treat earthworms with respect. For our farms to thrive, we need prices that cover our costs of production, including living wages for ourselves and everyone who works on our farms, plus a surplus to invest in the farm’s future. We need to make agricultural work a respected career with appropriate benefits.

AJP has drafted social stewardship standards, translating the abstract notion of social justice into the concrete terms of pricing for farm products and working conditions on farms. The basic premise of this project is that supportive relations of mutual respect and cooperation among the people who grow and sell food will result in a triple win for farmers, food workers and ultimately the people who eat the food. You can read about AJP standards, their history, and policies at www.agriculturaljusticeproject.org. The Domestic Fair Trade Association and Consumer Report, Greener Choices have evaluated AJP, along with other fair trade programs. You will find the very positive evaluations at www.thedfta.org and www.greenerchoices.org/eco-labels/label.cfm?LabelID=323.

The AJP standards were developed over four years of meetings with workers, small-scale farmers, fair trade companies and organizations, indigenous peoples, consumers, and organic certifiers. Hundreds of people from over sixty countries participated. The standards address
the following issues:

• farmer and all food system workers’ rights to freedom of association and collective bargaining
• fair wages and benefits for workers
• fair and equitable contracts for farmers and buyers
• fair pricing for farmers
• clear conflict resolution policies for farmers, workers and buyers
• the rights of indigenous peoples
• workplace health and safety
• farmworker housing
• high quality training with learning contracts for farm interns and apprentices
• the rights and protection of children on farms: no full-time child labor, but carefully supervised participation of children on farms.

In August, 2010 AJP posted  a first set of revised and expanded standards on the website – www.agriculturaljusticeproject.org and the final results of the 2015 -16 revisions will be posted in January, 2017.  Four years of pilot projects where we tested the draft standards against the reality of actual farms and food businesses and then seven years of experience with social justice certifying shaped the revisions.  During this time, AJP also developed the policies that  govern the program, training modules for certifiers and auditors, and materials to help farms and businesses comply with the standards.

AJP took the time to build the movement from the ground up by ensuring input from stakeholders in the food system over the last decade.  This work has resulted in a comprehensive set of standards that set the gold standard for social justice in the food system by ensuring fair food system practices in the U.S. that really address the priorities and needs of those who work to bring food to the table.  An important goal of the program is to distribute the tools across the country and build capacity of regional certifiers and worker organizations and community groups to carry the certification and education models forward in their local communities.  AJP has been offering training to regional U.S. organic certifiers so they can better serve their clients by offering social justice certification as an add-on to organic.

AJP was the first food label to have a farmworker advocacy organization working alongside farmer advocacy organizations to found and run the program.  The verification system is also the only one to include active participation by worker representatives during the audit.  In addition to the full staff of CATA, AJP has also trained five farmworker organizations: Central Campesino, MN, the Farmworkers Association of Florida, FL, Community to Community Development, WA, Lideres Campesinas, CA, and Agricultural Workers Alliance, Canada.

In 2013, lentils and grains with AJP’s Food Justice Certified label from the Farmer Direct Coop in Saskachewan began appearing in food coops in the Pacific NW and in Whole Foods stores across the country and in 2014, The Family Garden in Gainesville, Florida, and the first farms and food businesses in California and New York have completed AJP certification.

Core messages and conclusions

The urgency of reuniting the principles of fairness and organic is underlined in the concluding report of the National Organic Action Plan, From the Margins to the Mainstream – Advancing Organic Agriculture in the US (January 2010). As Lynn Coody summarized in The Organic Standard of June, 2010, “At their beginning organic regulations set a high bar for advancing cultural and social values in agricultural production. It is proposed that this foundation be restored by rededicating organic practice to an ethical food and agriculture system that honors the values of fairness and basic rights. Fairness includes fair trade; fair pricing (and contracts); fair access to land (and credit); and fair access to quality, organic food and seeds. These basic rights also encompass the rights of all people to follow their own cultural and traditional knowledge systems and the rights of farmers and farmworkers to have an empowered voice in the continued improvement of an ethical food system. This should apply directly to both domestic and foreign agricultural policies with the recognition of organic agriculture’s contributions to local food security and the alleviation of hunger both nationally and internationally.” (p. 7)

References

National Organic Action Plan, From the Margins to the Mainstream – Advancing Organic Agriculture in the US (January 2010).

Berkey, Rebecca Elaine. Just Farming: An Environmental Justice Perspective on the Capacity of Grassroots Organizations to Support the Rights of Organic Farmers and Laborers. Antioch University New England PhD, 2014.

Author’s Background

Elizabeth Henderson farmed at Peacework Farm in New York State, producing organically grown vegetables for the fresh market for over 30 years. A member of Northeast Organic Farming Association of New York (NOFA-NY) Board, she represents NOFA Interstate Council on Board of Agricultural Justice Project. Awards:  2009: NOFA-NY Lifetime Achievement Award.  2014: Eco-Farm “Advocate of Social Justice Award, the Justie.” Writings appear in NOFA’s The Natural Farmer. Lead author of Sharing the Harvest: A Citizen’s Guide to Community Supported Agriculture (Chelsea Green, 2007) also available in Spanish as an e-book – Compartiendo la Cosecha, and A Food Book for a Sustainable Harvest, written for the members of Peacework Organic CSA  (aka GVOCSA) in its twenty nineth year in 2017.

 

Land Justice – a Review

By Elizabeth Henderson

Land Justice: Re-imagining Land, Food and the Commons in the United States, Edited by Justine M. Williams and Eric Holt-Gimenez (Food First, 2017)

If you are looking for a deeper understanding of the ills in our food system and how to address them than “vote with your fork,” this is a book you should read as soon as possible.  Land Justice stands in contrast with so many food movement books that never question the basic premise that with a few adjustments, we can correct the excesses of the capitalist marketplace. Eric Holt-Gimenez lays out the book’s basic premise: “Racial injustice and the stark inequities in property and wealth in the US countryside aren’t just a quirk of history, but a structural feature of capitalist agriculture.  This means that in order to succeed in building an alternative agrarian future, today’s social movements will have to dismantle those structures.  It is the relationships in the food system, and how we govern them, that really matter.”(P. 2)

A collection of essays, Food Justice brings together stories of old injustices and on-going ones, stories that we all need to hear and take to heart. We learn about the Gulluh Geechee farmers, George Washington Carver and Booker T. Whatley, the Republic of New Africa, the Land Loss Prevention Fund, women farmers, white and black, the Acequia Communities, the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe, Rosalinda Guillen and farm worker organizing in Washington State, the People’s Community Market in Oakland, the Black Community Food Security Network in Detroit, and students taking action in Occupy the Farm in Berkeley.

Prefaces from three voices open Land Justice – a Native American, an African American and a family-scale farmer –voices that must be heard if we are to sort out the strands in the history of the “land problem” in this country and imagine a way forward towards a more just food system.

Winona LaDuke contrasts mainstream industrial, monocrop agriculture with the indigenous approach “based on biodiversity and the use of multiple locally adapted crops.” (P. xii) Plants, LaDuke tells us, are magical and “provide complex nutrients, medicinal values, cultural and spiritual connections, and they feed the soil.” She recounts the struggle of Native Americans for control of their land culminating in the successful class action suit, Keepseagle vs. Vilsack (1999) which won $680 million in reparations. While this award is far from adequate, it marks the resurgence and recovery of indigenous farming that is underway.  LaDuke declares that it is time for “decolonization.”

Taking as her chant “This Land is Contested,” LaDonna Redmond, laments the Indian removal that preceded the importation of slave labor: “The holocaust of the indigenous set the stage in the US for the rise of capitalism.” (P. xv) The free labor of 12 million enslaved Africans on stolen land “is what built the wealth of the so-called New World.” The Homestead Act, which allowed many landless European immigrants to access land, was not for former slaves. Redmond urges the solidarity of her people with Native Americans, the water and land protectors, and calls for unity against “corporate oligarchy and federal imperialism.” (P. xvii)

Belittling the vote with your fork vote analogy, Iowa farmer George Naylor declares:  “We need to recognize how market forces affect farmers, the land, and consumer behavior, and demand policy solutions to achieve a sustainable future.” (P. xix)  Naylor insists that “We need to de-commercialize food and land.” To accomplish this, Naylor proposes that we replace the cheap food policy that has enabled corporate dominance, with a system based on “Parity,” the New Deal farm programs involving “conservation-supply management to avoid wasteful, polluting over production; a price support that actually set a floor under the market prices rather than sending out government payments; grain reserves to avoid food shortages and food price spikes; and a quota system that was fair to all farmers and changed the incentives of production.” (P. xxi)

The authors of these essays have every reason to be bitter and pessimistic given what they have experienced and the long history of atrocities that mars our country’s past.  Yet, despite the recitals of inhuman cruelty and brutal greed, Land Justice leaves the reader energized and inspired by the writers’ courage and determination.  Together they show us a path forward through alliances and collaboration with the marginalized communities represented to “change the politics of property.” This book makes a major contribution to helping us develop a radical and coherent program for transformative change. As Holt-Gimenez concludes his incisive introduction, the authors are “in a struggle to remake society.” It is up to us to harken to their passionate words and to take “land justice” as “both a vision and a clarion call.” (P. 13)

 

Organic Agriculture International in Delhi: Flavors of Biodiversity with a Touch of Smog

By Elizabeth Henderson

IMG_9819
Four farmers from the PGS organized by the Institute for Integrated Rural Development in Maharashtra, India.

IMG_9830

IMG_9776
Demonstration of traditional spinning of cotton into thread.
One of many beautiful displays of seeds
One of the many displays of locally grown seeds. Biodiversity in all its forms was a major theme of the congress.
IMG_9788
Young farmers display the seeds they produce and sell.
IMG_9774
More biodiversity – Indian farmers brought hundreds of varieties of rice and millet.

Each Organic World Congress (OWC) feels like a series of intense, vivid conversations. I renew acquaintance with people I have come to know over the years since 1996 when I attended my first OWC. And then there are the startling discoveries, encounters with people and projects I had no clue existed. Way too much happens to report it all, blow by blow. Since I know I will not be able to encompass it all, I will focus on a few themes and a few intense encounters.

At the OWC this year, I attended the plenary sessions, helped conduct a pre-conference on CSA in Asia, spent a few moments at INOFO meetings, gave a short talk on succession planting for CSAs in the Farmers’ Track and attended as many farmer talks as I could manage, participated in a panel on CSA networks, and contributed to a discussion on Fairness for All. I will share some highlights; if you would like more detail on elections and motions, here are links to the account of the General Assembly by Brian Baker, President of the IFOAM NA board (https://www.facebook.com/groups/1466284576825331/permalink/1512770165510105/), and the official IFOAM report, The Insider https://www.ifoam.bio/en/search?find=the+insider  The Organic Farming Association of India (OFAI), the OWC hosts, promise to post all of the farmer track presentations on their website in 12 languages (http://ofai.org/ ). Continue reading “Organic Agriculture International in Delhi: Flavors of Biodiversity with a Touch of Smog”

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑